YANGON // Myanmar was trapped in a post-election limbo on Tuesday with official results barely trickling in.
Still, opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi’s party claimed a victory massive enough to give it the presidency and loosen the military’s grip on the country.
In an interview with the BBC, Ms Suu Kyi said her National League for Democracy expects to win 75 per cent of the seats contested in the 664-member parliament.
The union election commission has announced results for only 88 seats, giving 78 to the NLD and five to the ruling party from Sunday’s vote. It has given no explanation for the slow results.
Later, Tin Oo, a senior colleague of Ms Suu Kyi, went a step further, saying the party will receive “nearly” 81 per cent of the votes. “That is the preliminary calculation,” he said.
The delay has raised concern, with NLD spokesman Win Tien saying that the election commission has been “delaying intentionally because maybe they want to play a trick or something”.
“It doesn’t make sense that they are releasing the results piece by piece. It shouldn’t be like that,” he said after a party meeting at Ms Suu Kyi’s house. “They are trying to be crooked.”
The surprising accusation added a worrying twist to what had been an amicable election, with the ruling party appearing to be taking its expected loss gracefully.
It is also disconcerting because Myanmar’s former military junta, which had called elections in 1990 after 28 years in power, refused then to recognise the NLD’s overwhelming victory. It continued its brutal rule for two more decades, keeping Ms Suu Kyi under house arrest for much of that period.
Faced with intense international pressure after becoming a South East Asian pariah, the junta finally gave up power in a choreographed transition to democracy, and was replaced in 2011 by the Union Solidarity Development Party, largely made up of former junta members.
The government, which remains beholden to the military, is led by president Thein Sein, a former general who has been praised for initiating political and economic reforms to end Myanmar’s isolation and jumpstart its moribund economy.
In the BBC interview, Ms Suu Kyi was asked why, given the events of 1990, things will be different this time.
“They’ve been saying repeatedly they’ll respect the will of the people and that they will implement the results of the election,” she said.
She also said the people are far more aware now than in 1990.
“The times are different, the people are different ... very much more alert to what is going on around them. And then of course there’s the communications revolution which has made a huge difference. Everybody gets on to the net and informs everybody else of what is happening, and so it’s much more difficult for those who wish to engage in irregularities to get away with it,” she said.
Observers also believe the military has little to gain by interfering again, because as part of the reforms toward democracy it has already secured its position with constitutionally guaranteed powers.
No matter who forms the government, the military gets to keep control of the ministries of defence, interior and border security, as well as large parts of the national economy. The military can also block constitutional amendments because 25 per cent of the seats in parliament are reserved for it and amendments require more than a 75 per cent vote.
If the NLD secures a two-thirds majority in parliament – a likely scenario now – it would gain control over the executive posts under Myanmar’s complicated parliamentary-presidency system.
* Associated Press