After <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/uae/2022/01/17/abu-dhabi-blasts-a-sinful-attack-by-houthi-militia-says-senior-uae-official/" target="_blank">Monday’s terrorist attack</a> against the UAE, which killed three people and wounded six, international attention is once again focused on low-cost <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/gulf-news/2022/01/17/saudi-led-coalition-intercepts-houthi-drones-launched-out-of-sanaa-airport/" target="_blank">drones</a>: how to stop them, and how to prevent their acquisition by terror groups. This follows the UAE's announcement that drones were a suspected method behind the attack, but an investigation is ongoing. <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/gulf-news/oman/2021/07/30/uk-defence-ministry-says-israeli-ship-targeted-in-attack-off-oman/" target="_blank">Explosive drones</a>, or the “loitering munitions” suspected in this case, have become a challenge to advanced militaries around the world. But what exactly are these weapons, frequently <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/gulf-news/2022/01/18/who-are-yemens-houthis-and-what-do-they-want/" target="_blank">used by the Houthis</a> and other Iran-backed groups to attack Saudi Arabia and Iraq? Iran has proliferated unmanned aircraft originally designed for target practice in the 1980s. They typically have a rear-mounted “pusher propeller” system and are constructed from cheap material, sometimes including wooden components. As cameras evolved, drones such as Iran’s Ababil were used for reconnaissance, but in recent years the flimsy looking planes have been rigged with bombs and are sometimes referred to as “Kamikaze drones”. Notoriously, they were used in an attack that shocked the world at Abqaiq in Saudi Arabia in September 2019, when critical oil infrastructure was destroyed. Drones such as the Houthi Qasef-2K and Sammad 3, propeller-driven aircraft, are slow moving but have a long range. They have high endurance petrol engines, often made from strong, lightweight material such as titanium and carbon fibre, to reduce weight. The Houthis also have a small cruise missile fitted with turbojet engines, copied from European designs. Many of these captured and shot down drones, including the Quds-1 missile, were found to have components made in Iran, according to a January 2020 UN Panel of Experts report. And because of their slow speed, small size, low and unpredictable flight path, they are difficult to detect for ground-based radar systems. If you have heard the phrase “flying under the radar” – a dangerous job for any pilot – this is roughly the concept used for attack drones, except the risk to a human pilot is removed. Much of the technology transfer for these aircraft has been sent to Iran through front companies such as Tehran Hobby Ltd, which has illegally obtained engine components from foreign civilian companies. Indeed, the Qasef drone and similar variants, frequently used to attack Saudi Arabia, is based on the Iranian Ababil drone and built from foreign parts used on commercial drones, plus parts that have been reverse engineered. These unmanned aircraft are sometimes referred to as “loitering munitions” because they can fly on an unpredictable pattern for long periods and sometimes change course, unlike most missiles that fly on a fixed course. The concept is often thought of as low tech – and the Iranian designs and Houthi variants often are. But loitering munitions – as opposed to Iran’s target drones such as the Ababil – were first developed by the US in the 1980s. The most recent variants, such as the Israeli Harop, are far deadlier than Houthi drones, with much more sophisticated guidance systems and autonomous capability. By contrast, Iran-designed drones should be easy to intercept, but it has proven challenging because modern air defences are designed to shoot down missiles, including ballistic missiles that travel on a predictable arc high in the atmosphere, or enemy aircraft, which have a large radar signature. These air defense systems are a legacy of the Cold War when many existing systems were developed, including the US Patriot system and the Russian S-300 family of systems. Russia and America simply did not expect drones to be used in this way — low level kamikazes that fly under the radar horizon— and therefore did not design air defences accordingly. This problem is quickly being solved; the US Patriot missile system PAC-3 variant is designed to shoot down drones with 360-degree radar coverage configured to detect the small objects. Israel’s Iron Dome, which has powerful AI-assisted targeting computers, has proven similarly capable against drones, and the US is now developing a similar system, while Russia’s new S-500 system is also designed to take down drones.