Florida's plan to resist vaccines for 'healthy children' reignites debate

Experts are divided with many insisting vaccines for young people is still the best defence

A young girl receives a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine developed for children between 5 and 11 years of age, at the Fejer County Szent Gyorgy Teaching Hospital in Szekesfehervar, Hungary. EPA

Paediatrician medic Jakob Maske vaccinates an 11-year-old boy in his Berlin office. AFP

A child receives a vaccine at a school in Castellon de la Plana, Spain. EPA

A young girl receives a vaccine at the Szent Lazar County Hospital in Salgotarjan, Hungary. EPA

A boy wearing a Christmas hat is vaccinated in a shopping centre near Hamburg, Germany. AP

A US health chief courted controversy this month after recommending “healthy children” should not be vaccinated against Covid-19.

Florida's surgeon general Dr Joseph Ladapo's declaration reignited debate over the need for younger members of society to be immunised.

Major inoculation campaigns across the world have been central to the fight against the pandemic, with multiple studies showing that, for adults, the benefits of being vaccinated greatly outweigh the risks.

Children who do not have medical conditions that make them vulnerable tend to be less likely than adults to become seriously ill from Covid-19, although the threat is not removed.

As American media have reported, it is partly for this reason that, earlier this month, the Sunshine State became the first in the country to recommend that children in good health are not vaccinated.

National medical organisations in the country were critical of the decision, with some suggesting that it was motivated by politics rather than science.

But how do the pro and cons of vaccination stack up for young children, in particular those aged from five to 11? We consider the evidence and offer the views of experts.

Vaccinating children: the argument for

Covid-19 vaccines are “a controlled, safe route to prevention and preventing people from a very serious infection”, according to Dr Bharat Pankhania, a senior clinical lecturer and senior consultant in communicable disease control at the University of Exeter in the UK.

He said a key reason in favour of vaccination was the risk of post-Covid syndrome, also known as Long Covid, in which symptoms persist for weeks and months after the initial infection.

At the moment, he said PCS had an “unknown endpoint” because it had not yet been determined how long it could last.

“For these reasons, it’s important to protect the next generation; therefore vaccination is a very safe way to do it,” he said.

People who are vaccinated are, said Dr Pankhania, less likely to become infected and, if they are infected, tend to remain infectious for a shorter period.

So although vaccination does not completely stop people from becoming infected and spreading infections to others, Dr Pankhania said it did reduce the rate of infection.

As a result, he indicated that were wider benefits to society if younger children were vaccinated, on top of the benefits they received as individuals.

“Your little children may be perfectly okay, but they will spread their infection to granny and kill her,” said Dr Pankhania.

Among the most discussed side effects of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, which is the shot given most often to five to 11-year-olds, are myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the heart’s outer lining).

These cases have been very rare and, said the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention in online advice, they have been found “especially in male adolescents and young adults”. So the risk to 5 to 11-year-olds is extremely low.

The CDC continues to recommend that everyone aged 5 and above is vaccinated against Covid-19.

“The known risks of Covid-19 illness and its related, possibly severe complications, such as long-term health problems, hospitalisation and even death, far outweigh the potential risks of having a rare adverse reaction to vaccination, including the possible risk of myocarditis and pericarditis,” the organisation said.

Vaccinating children: the argument against

A key argument sometimes used against vaccinating younger children is that their risk of falling seriously ill if they are infected with the coronavirus is low.

A study in The Lancet cited by US media gave the estimated infection fatality rate — the proportion of infections that result in death — for each year group from age 1 to 100. For children aged between 5 and 11, the rates varied between 0.0023 per cent and 0.0031 per cent.

Above this age group, death rates climbed, but remained low among young people, so that an 18-year-old has a 0.01 per cent (or one in 10,000) chance of dying from Covid-19.

“The evidence is the number of children who’ve got severely sick and at risk is very low and probably no higher than any other respiratory infection,” said Prof Ian Jones, a professor of virology at the University of Reading in the UK.

Figures for the US indicate that the number of younger children who have died from Covid-19 has been dwarfed by the numbers killed in accidents or homicides.

Another reason given to not vaccinate young children against Covid-19 is, said Prof Jones, that the vaccines reduced the chance of, but did not stop, infection.

“I’m generally of the view that medical intervention should be for a specific purpose. In the case of Covid transmission, that purpose is not entirely clear,” he said.

Although not convinced by the argument himself, Prof Jones said vaccinating younger children may sensitise children to vaccination and discourage them from seeking vaccination when they were older.

Indicating that the issues are finely balanced, Prof Jones said overall he was “slightly against” giving a Covid-19 vaccine to 5 to 11-year-olds but that he did not have “a particularly strong view”.

Opponents of vaccinating younger children have said that the benefits of jabs are limited because so many children have already been infected and so have some natural immunity against the coronavirus.

How is the world handling the issue?

UAE authorities moved early to provide vaccines to younger children, rolling out the Sinopharm jab for 3 to 17-year-olds in August. They made the Pfizer-BioNTech jab available for 5 to 11-year-olds in February.

The European Medicines Agency approved the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for 5 to 11-year-olds in late October, with this age group given one third the dose of people aged 12 and above.

Regulators cited a study of nearly 2,000 children that indicated the vaccine, known as Comirnaty, was around 90.7 per cent effective at preventing symptomatic Covid-19.

Typical side effects in 5 to 11-year-olds were similar to those in people aged 12 and above, being usually “mild or moderate and improving within a few days of vaccination”.

“The Committee for Medical Products for Human Use [an EMA committee] therefore concluded that the benefits of Comirnaty in children aged 5 to 11 outweigh the risks, particularly in those with conditions that increase the risk of severe Covid-19,” the EMA said in a briefing document.

Shortly after the EMA’s announcement, the Food and Drug Administration in the US also gave the go-ahead for the vaccine’s use in 5 to 11-year-olds, saying that “no serious side effects” were detected.

The UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation recommended in December that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine be given to children aged 5 to 11 who have factors that make them more vulnerable should they become infected, or who live with an immunosuppressed person. Vaccination was extended to 5 to 11-year-olds who are not clinically vulnerable in February.

Israel started a campaign to vaccinate children as young as 5 in November.

Australia began to immunise children aged 5 to 11 in January.

India this month began vaccinating 12 to 14-year-olds, but has yet to start with younger children.