Why the World Trade Organisation is in danger of becoming irrelevant

The best way to show that it still matters is to negotiate an agreement on fisheries, Covid-19 vaccines or free trade in farming, experts say

WTO director general Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala is facing one of the biggest tests of her diplomatic skills since taking the job 15 months ago. EPA

The World Trade Organisation is facing one of its most dire moments, the culmination of years of slide towards oblivion and ineffectiveness. Now may be a chance to turn the tide and re-emerge as a champion of free and fair trade — or face a future further in doubt.

For the first time in four-and-a-half years, after a pandemic pause, government ministers from WTO countries will gather for four days starting on Sunday to tackle issues such as overfishing of the seas, Covid-19 vaccines for the developing world and food security at a time when Russia's war in Ukraine has blocked the export of millions of tonnes of Ukrainian grain to developing nations.

Facing a key test of her diplomatic skill since taking the job 15 months ago, WTO director general Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala in recent days expressed "cautious optimism" that progress could be made on at least one of four issues expected to dominate the meeting: fisheries subsidies, agriculture, the pandemic response and reform of the organisation, spokesman Fernando Puchol said.

Diplomats and trade teams have been working “flat out — long, long hours” to serve up at least one “clean text” for a possible agreement — that ministers can simply rubber-stamp and not have to negotiate — on one of those issues, Mr Puchol told reporters on Friday.

“It's difficult to predict a result right now,” he said.

The Geneva-based body, barely a quarter-century old, brings together 164 countries to help ensure smooth and fair international trade and settle trade disputes.

Some outside experts expect few accomplishments out of the meeting, saying the main one may simply be getting the ministers to the table.

“The multilateral trading system is in a bad way. The Ukraine situation is not helping,” said Clemens Boonekamp, an independent trade policy analyst and former head of WTO’s agricultural division. “But the mere fact that they are coming together is a sign of a respect for the system.”

Alan Wolff, a former WTO deputy director general, sounded optimistic that members could make at least some headway.

They might reach an agreement, he said, to help relieve a looming global food crisis arising from the war in Ukraine by ensuring the UN World Food Programme receives a waiver from food export bans imposed by WTO countries eager to feed their own people.

Mr Wolff, now senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington, expressed confidence in Ms Okonjo-Iweala, saying: “I’m not willing to sell her short.’’

He said members “seem to be making progress’’ on an agreement to scale back subsidies that encourage overfishing — something they have been trying to do for more than two decades.

“Do they wrap it up this time?’’ Mr Wolff asked. “Unclear. It’s been a drama.’’

One problem — among many — is that the WTO operates by consensus, so any one of its 164 member countries could gum up the works.

In short, the WTO has become an important diplomatic battleground between developed and developing countries, and some experts say reform is needed if it’s ever to get things done.

The trade body, created in 1995 as a successor to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, has experienced a slow unravelling. It hasn't produced a major trade deal in years. The last big success was a 2014 agreement billed as a boost to lower-income countries that cut up red tape on goods clearing borders.

Years ago, the US started clamping down on the WTO's appeals court, which in theory delivers the last word on trade disputes, such as a high-profile one between the US and EU involving plane-making giants Airbus and Boeing.

Then US president Donald Trump came along, threatening to pull America out of the WTO over his insistence that it was unfair to the US. In the end, he didn’t, and simply bypassed the WTO — slapping sanctions on allies and foes alike and ignoring the trade organisation's rule book and dispute-resolution system.

Once a champion of the WTO, the US has rued the admission of China and insists Beijing has been breaching many of the trade body's rules. The US accuses China of excessively supporting state-run companies and impeding free trade, among other things. China denies those allegations.

A generation ago, the WTO drew huge, vituperative, even violent protests — notably from anti-globalists and anarchists who detested its closed-door secrecy and elites-decide-all image.

William Reinsch, a former US trade official, said that the WTO is now in danger of becoming irrelevant. The best way to show that it still matters, he wrote this month, is to negotiate an agreement, perhaps on fisheries, Covid-19 vaccines or a more difficult issue: encouraging more free trade in farming.

Mr Reinsch, now at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said the US needs to be doing more — including making compromises — to ensure the WTO can reach agreement on contentious issues.

“The future of the WTO is at risk,” he said. “Failure would be bad for the fish and the farmers, but it would also be bad for a rule-of-law-based global economy.’’